You are here: Home Ideas Add National Online Mapping to Recovery.gov
 

Jump into the discussion

Here's a question to get you started:

What do you consider to be the most exciting upcoming technology or system in the field of managing, aggregating, and visualizing diverse types of data?

Add National Online Mapping to Recovery.gov

idea

What is the idea?

Add National Online Mapping to Recovery.gov

 

The advent of online data and mapping, provides Recovery.gov (and the federal government itself) with a unique opportunity to take advantage of platforms that are fast, efficient, cost effective and accessible. Just under a year ago, we launched a national data warehouse and mapping tool – http://www.policymap.com/ – to provide users with online access to data, maps, tables and reports in a sophisticated yet easy to use web platform. Based on that experience, we have some thoughts and examples on what the Recovery.gov data and mapping application should provide to the public so that the result is not just a high-quality visual display of information, but an underlying searchable database of information for the government and the public. We’ve started to map stimulu transportation investments in most of the MidAtantic states on PolicyMap and hope to post a link to those later this week – in the meantime, check out some of our current work to see what we are talking about.

We would recommend that any platform used by Recovery.org to make stimulus investments transparent to the public possess, at a minimum, the following abilities:

1. Recovery.gov’s database and mapping platform should be a national online platformthat allows users to see stimulus investments in a standardized way throughout the county. States have begun to create their own websites showcasing their investments (which is great), but they appear in different formats. Some have pdfs listing their investments, others have begun to create state maps showing investment dollars, and still others offer a series of tables showing investments by county. As these sites proliferate, it will become difficult to compare information across important planning geographies (like MSAs) or by type of investment. Creating a uniform format and then providing states and grantees with the ability to load their investment data directly into a single national platform will allow stimulus dollars investments to be both transparent to the public and easy to analyze across geographies and investment types.

2. Once loaded, individual stimulus investments should appear as clickable points or shapes in a fast, online map. The mapping component needs to be able to display the exact locations of investments (points or shapes) so that people can zoom into a neighborhood or city or MSA and see EXACTLY where the money is going. The mapping needs to show not just where the money went, but for what purpose, how much and to whom. And the location on the map should provide a link back to the agency that received the funds. The public needs an online interactive map to see where investments have been made in their city, neighborhood, block or next door. For an example , this link shows investments at the neighborhood levels on an interactive map. You can zoom, pan, and search for locations and click on any point to read the details of the investments.

    Investments at the neighborhood level

     

    3. The online mapping platform also needs to house information beyond just the locations of the stimulus investments. Federal dollars allocated to communities through the stimulus (or even other federal programs) should be a part of the platform and displayed thematically. Users should be able to simply mouse over any geography in the nation to see how much federal money they are getting. They should be able to overlay the stimulus site investments themselves to then see exactly where that money went within one integrated platform. For an example this link shows a map of Earned Income Tax Credit received by zip code in 2006.

    EITC by zip code

     

    4. When it comes to any conversation about investments in “place”, the need for accurate, relevant and timely information about neighborhoods, cities, metro areas, and states is essential. The government is a repository of great public data; information about unemployment from BLS, tax return data from the IRS, population characteristics from the Census and many other statistics are regularly collected and freely available. By incorporating this type of information in the online platform, users can see on a map not just where dollars directed at creating new jobs have gone, but see what the unemployment rate is in that area; users can see not just where homes are receiving weatherization assistance, but what the average age of a home is in that area, etc. This capacity gives the Recovery.gov site the potential to become not just a place for the presentation of data, but as an underlying tool for evaluating the impact of investments. This map shows an investment at a specific place layered over the vacancy rate. Combining context data layers is necessary to diagnose need and measure the effect of recovery dollars.

    Residential Vacancy Data

    5. The platform must be searchable by the public. While Recovery.gov will need to display a series of pre-drawn tables and graphs that help to visually display where stimulus dollars are being allocated, the underlying online database platform must be searchable by the public. As states and grantees upload their investments information into the single online platform, users should be able to quickly download a list of investments meeting any number of criteria so a whole range of questions can be answered on the fly. From “How many energy investments have been made as a part of the stimulus in my city compared to another city?” “How have stimulus dollars been allocated by congressional district?” “What are the education investments being made in my neighborhood being used for?” Making information accessible and making information usable are two different things. The stimulus investment reporting must allow citizens to interact with the data in useful ways to answer questions about their communities.

    Why is it important?

    Recovery.gov needs to pursue a solution that provides the public with detailed information about the use of stimulus dollars in a single national web platform that can generate easy-to-understand visuals like maps and tables -  as well as sophisticated reports and analysis.

    Adoption of an online platform also provides the federal government with a unique opportunity to take this all a step further and create - in one, single place - a repository of cross-silo, public data that can be used to:

    1) provide the public with free access to public data;

    2) evaluate how communities are changing over time as a result of stimulus investments; and

    3) open up GIS data for local communities as they consider where future investments make sense.

    Online data and mapping capacities give the government an opportunity to do this quickly and cost-effectively.  The tools have already been developed and are ready to use in applications like PolicyMap.com.

    Adoption of an online platform also provides the federal government with a unique opportunity to take this all a step further and create - in one, single place - a repository of cross-silo, public data that can be used to:

    1) provide the public with free access to public data;

    2) evaluate how communities are changing over time as a result of stimulus investments; and

    3) open up GIS data for local communities as they consider where future investments make sense.

    Online data and mapping capacities give the government an opportunity to do this quickly and cost-effectively.  The tools have already been developed and are ready to use in applications like PolicyMap.com.

    1) provide the public with free access to public data;

    2) evaluate how communities are changing over time as a result of stimulus investments; and

    3) open up GIS data for local communities as they consider where future investments make sense.

    Online data and mapping capacities give the government an opportunity to do this quickly and cost-effectively.  The tools have already been developed and are ready to use in applications like PolicyMap.com.

    2) evaluate how communities are changing over time as a result of stimulus investments; and

    3) open up GIS data for local communities as they consider where future investments make sense.

    Online data and mapping capacities give the government an opportunity to do this quickly and cost-effectively.  The tools have already been developed and are ready to use in applications like PolicyMap.com.

    Submitted by PolicyMap from TRF's PolicyMap (Web Development) on Apr 28, 2009

    This idea is now closed to further comments.

    Current number of stars: 4
    based on 63 votes
    Tags:

    28 Comments

    Member comment

    I agree that online mapping tied into other data sources is part of the essential suite of visualization methods required. Besides GIS mapping, I'd like to see relationship mapping (of contractors/agencies), systems mapping (all the environmental projects, say, and how they link into larger policy goals).

     

    Although hugely complex, as are the problems we face, the interface needs to be as simple as possible.

    Comment from arthureves at emergentdesign.org on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    I think mapping is a good visual technique to show the data and this idea has clearly been well thought out.

    What I'd like to see from the mapping perspective is some level of assurance that specific regions haven't been allotted more then their 'fair share' of funding.

    I can imagine many small towns getting squeezed out of funding consideration because they don't have fancy lawyers or deep political connections.

    However, despite the growing urbanization such regional economic centers are key for America's continued success and are as deserving, proportionately, of stimulus.

    Comment from wjhuie on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    Adding national mapping capabilities like those available on PolicyMap to recovery.gov would introduce an unprecedented level of transparency to the pattern of recovery spending. while at the same time offering the public an easy way to connect the dots between stimulus dollars and concrete outcomes.

    Comment from jwaldman on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    The central aspect of mapping is adding geocodes to all data items, and making data searchable and extractable by those geocodes (e.g, through use of an Open Geospatial Consortium WMS and WFT queries).  That way, data can be mapped in lots of ways, by lots of people, for lots of purposes - not just in pre-canned ways.

    Comment from mfidelman on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    Maps do provide increased transparency to data, graphically showing citizens data of interest in their area, and providing a natural way to zoom into more detail. All the ideas you've proposed are important, though I would also add user-generated content

    , as a way for citizens to participate in the recovery process.

     

    Although your site displays an impressive amount of effort, I'd caution that the average citizen wants easy-to-use and easy-to-understand maps of programs and spending, and does not necessarily need to get lost in details or related economic data. Such layers are interesting for an economist, but for Recovery.gov, maps showing programs and spending, with links to explanations elsewhere on Recovery.gov would be best.

     

    In addition to simple geographic maps, I echo the comment about simple hierarchical maps as being another good way to show relationships between programs, between areas, and between spending.

    Comment from hotsauce on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    What do you guys think of this?

    proposed Stimulus spending (Via Stimuluswatch.org), and Unemployment data (Via Bureau of Labor Statistics). this took me about 10 minutes to make.

    hopefully this embed works in the comments section:

    <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://maker.demo.geocommons.com/javascripts/embed.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
      Maker.maker_host='http://maker.demo.geocommons.com';Maker.finder_host='http://finder.demo.geocommons.com';Maker.core_host='http://core.demo.geocommons.com';
      Maker.load_map("maker_map_70", "70");
    </script>
    <div id="maker_map_70"></div>

    Comment from Billfgreer at FortiusOne on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    Ok, i guess the embed didn't work, here is the link: http://maker.geocommons.com/maps/2788

    Comment from Billfgreer at FortiusOne on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    This tool provides the exactly the type of transparency that the administration is advocating.  In my mind, no site on the web contains the same amount of data and features without the need to purchase/download software or even install a plug-in. 

    If it were used for recovery.gov, it might make sense to have one version that's streamlined for easy use by the public and a second that's more geared for researchers or other power users.  I think these two sets of users have different needs for information.

    Comment from chenders203 on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    Agreed. We've loaded in over 4,000 variables from public sources (Census, IRS, FBI, Postal Service, BLS, HUD, etc.) as well as variables that users send us - so the underlying database/platform is extensive.  One of our goals was to load as much public data as we could get our hands on into one fast, national, web application.  And, we really wanted users to able to overlay address level points on top of thematic neighborhood data.  So, the capacity to do this kind of mapping on recovery.gov is there.  PolicyMap's users are public policy makers, state and local governments, foundations, financial institutions and the like.  An application designed for the public would need a different user interface.

    Comment from Maggie at TRF PolicyMap on Apr 28, 2009
    Member comment

    I think the discussion around this great idea is evidence of the need for an approach akin to the semantic lens idea submitted here.

    What we're seeing here is that nearly everyone agrees that map views of stimulus data are essential, but everyone has their own ideas of precisely what information they'd like to include in such a map. Sure recovery.gov can (& should) provide some common map views, but it would serve people even better if it provided a way that people could easily create their own map views (and other views), fill them with whatever recovery data they want, and then share them with the world.

     

    Comment from LeeFeigenbaum at Cambridge Semantics on Apr 28, 2009
    | Next page » Page 1 of 4